Or: The Durbin Amendment & How it Affects Me… (Part 2)
And the pain continues…
When last we met, I wrote of how the Durbin Amendment made you have to pay an extra $5 a month to your bank for having a debit card. The sad thing was that the Durbin Amendment was designed to make people that have debit cards pay less. This should not be taken as a statement that sounds a lot like ‘those evil banks.’ They’re not. The government in its infinite wisdom cost them $12.9 billion dollars annually in passing Durbin. Banks, like us; have jobs, buildings, employees, pensions, light bills and everything else. It’s pretty hard to take $13 billion on the chin, so they do what any business does when the cost of business goes up: they pass it along.
In truth, we as consumers paid little, if anything, for using our check cards. Now, we have to pay $5 extra monthly for having a debit card, because the government wanted to save us money (for having a debit card). Back in my poli-sci courses in college we called this the ‘stick and carrot’. In other words if you want to move a mule, you can hit it with a stick, or tempt it with a carrot. The problem is that the government in effect created a big stick and beat $13 billion in damages to the banks and they can’t take all that abuse. By the way, you’re about to lose your free checking too…
Didn’t you read that letter from the bank? No? Probably made to look like junk mail.
Well adding $5 per account wasn’t enough, so unless you’re a high roller and keep anywhere from $15k-25k in your bank, your monthly fee is about to go up, even if you have free checking. With some banks you can get around it if you have direct deposit. Problem is that everyone’s employers do not offer direct deposit, and it’s not at all banks.
Remember now, that the reason for these hikes is that the government wanted to save you money. You meaning the debit card holder. The way it implemented these nice feelings for you was to make banks take a $13 billion loss in fees by restricting what they could charge businesses for accepting debit cards. Confused? That’s OK, because it makes no sense. It’s like the government trying to get your kids to eat more peanut butter, so a law is passed saying that Kroger has to sell Peanut Butter at a loss. So Kroger ups the prices on everything else it sells and now Mom can’t afford to buy Timmy peanut butter at any price because her grocery bill just shot up.
Seriously… where is the carrot? Where is the “win-win” solution that we are taught in business school? Why not offer a tax incentive to banks that are able to reduce debit card fees charged to business owners that accept debit cards? There is no loss of fees, but instead a gain in momentum. In that arena, any bank that charged a $5 monthly debit card fee or removed free checking in order to get the tax benefit would simply be drained of its clientele as they left for greener pastures.
If this sounds like you’ll use your credit card a lot more in the future than your debit card, the government won’t mind. They get a cut of every credit card sale before taxes are even paid. Didn’t they mention that?
I realize that many people right now are leaving their current banks for other banks and verbally beating up many account managers that have no authority in these fees what so ever. Please remember that they had no say. Also, a bank has to keep the lights on and the bills paid, and employees paid just like anyone else. My grand parents use to say that, “Water finds its own level”, and here and now is no different. They have to fill the gap the government caused and a $13 billion dollar stick beats a mule mighty hard.






